Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0885

reference
792-tree-1
name
0885
tree-preservation-order

undefined

792-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044384 50.865261)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044328 50.865255,-1.044330 50.865267,-1.044338 50.865277,-1.044350 50.865285,-1.044366 50.865290,-1.044384 50.865292,-1.044401 50.865290,-1.044417 50.865285,-1.044430 50.865277,-1.044438 50.865267,-1.044441 50.865256,-1.044439 50.865245,-1.044431 50.865235,-1.044418 50.865227,-1.044403 50.865222,-1.044385 50.865220,-1.044368 50.865222,-1.044352 50.865227,-1.044339 50.865234,-1.044331 50.865244,-1.044328 50.865255)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL